Have you ever carefully explained something to someone and then had them take your words completely out of context? Over and over again, despite your repeated explanations to the contrary? It can get really frustrating because pretty soon you feel like a broken record. You start asking yourself, “Why aren’t they paying attention to what I’m really saying?” It seems so unfair when people misunderstand us because they weren’t really paying attention in the first place, and then try to make us the villian. As if that’s not bad enough, then others around us have to put their two cents in. And, of course, everyone seems to have a different opinion. Pretty soon, all parties involved are disagreeing with each other. That’s the ripple nature of conflict. It may start as a small thing at first, but if we keep throwing rocks into the pond over and over again the waters never calm down.
What is called “selective hearing” happens all the time in the church. Just like the rest of the world, we Christians often hear only what we want to hear, instead of what is actually being said. As a photojournalist I deal with this in my profession all the time. What is usually at the heart of it is that (a) someone has a preconceived agenda that they don’t want to come out and be truthful about, and whatever you or I said or did threatens that or (b) both sides have unrealistic expectations of each other or (c) one person is trying to make themselves look superior to another.
Friends, as Christians this should not be. We need to be truthful with one another about what’s really going on. Having agendas that we’re expecting others to adhere to without their knowledge is a no-win situation. We need to let people know up front if we’ve already made a decision about something, or if we have changed our position on a matter. Expecting someone to play by our rules, when they don’t know what the game plan is, can be downright distrastrous for all concerned.
We should always be honest with others in our dealings with them, but we don’t need to do it in a way which causes harm to our witness for Christ, or reflects on God’s reputation. As Christians, if we have a personal disagreement with someone else, we already know what scripture tells us to do. There is a three step process in Matthew 18:15-17 all Christians are supposed to follow when they have a personal grievance with another brother or sister. When we put one step before the other, as is frequently the case, then we wind up causing an even greater misunderstanding.
Sometimes that doesn’t apply because there is public disagreement about what establishes the facts of a matter. In that case, we all tend to go with what we believe to be the truth. Anyone in law enforcement can tell you that two different people will probably have two entirely different versions of exactly the same event. One saw it from one angle and the other saw it from another. However both accounts are valuable in seeing the whole picture. As a pastor I know so wisely remarked, “There’s always three sides to every story. My side, your side, and the truth.” No matter how smart or well informed we are, no one this side of heaven has all the right answers. When we have taken someone’s statements out of context, and made them appear to mean something else entirely, then we need to be big enough Christians to admit that we were wrong.
Being taken the wrong way has happened to me lots of times, and probably to you, and it will happen to every human being on the planet at some point in time. And, because we are imperfect human beings chances are good that it will happen again. Sometimes we’ll be the victim of such unfair tactics, and sometimes we’ll be the perpretrators. Unfortunately, that’s human nature. The important thing is that we make sure we follow the Lord’s counsel in the matter when these things happen, whether the other person chooses to do so or not. That may not give us exactly the outcome we desire, but it will show that we are the kind of Christians who really are willing to put God’s agenda first.
mbaker:
Thank you for this thoughtful article! D’accord! (as the French say) I agree!
You said:
“As a pastor I know so wisely remarked, “There’s always three sides to every story. My side, your side, and the truth.” No matter how smart or well informed we are, no one this side of heaven has all the right answers. When we have taken someone’s statements out of context, and made them appear to mean something else entirely, then we need to be big enough Christians to admit that we were wrong. ”
It is so easy to take someone’s statements out of context. We are busy people who attempt to listen quickly, read quickly and answer quickly. However, James 1:19 tells us that we need to be:
“….Swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath.”
At this point in my life, I know I have been wrong so many times and wronged so many Christians either out of anger, circumstances in my own life that made me a little off balance, and a complete misunderstanding of what had been communicated to me. However, I am so thankful to have received the forgiveness and reacceptance of so many Christians who were willing to understand. I didn’t deserve it. I received the grace and mercy of God through the body of Christ.
We need to give each other the “benefit of the doubt.” This is the counsel I give myself and my children when someone seems to have miscommunicated with them. What I mean to say is that we need to apply the grace and mercy of God to any communication that is misunderstood or possibly too harsh. They could be having a bad day or be going through a very serious valley in their life which causes them to communicate in a way that was unanticipated.
I always seem to receive what I don’t deserve from the body of Christ–this is why I love them so much, unlike Doug Perry who has referred to the body of Christ as a “monster.” I am truly humbled by the love of Jesus administered to me by this body that, yes, sometimes communicates in ways that we do not anticipate!
By: Free Indeed on August 3, 2007
at 12:39 am
Free,
You made a great point there. Sometimes in our zeal to prove we are right we go overboard, and do and say things we shouldn’t.
We want forgiveness for our own shortcomings but we don’t want to extend the same grace and mercy to others. That is unfortunately the double standard in so many Christians I see.
I’m glad to see you are not one of them!
By: mbaker on August 3, 2007
at 1:08 am
As the scripture says Margaret,
Pro 21:2 Every way of a man is right in his own eyes, but the LORD weighs the heart.
This happened Yesterday over at SOj. The comment I made was misunderstood ( creating a straw man) then it was rebuked and attacked. It mattered little that I tried to explain what I meant by my statements. Drew had seen red, had decided to fight against his own staw man and had been offensive in the process!
I have no problem disagreeing with people with out getting angry with them. E.G. Free indeed is a good friend but we think differently about music and I was pretty strong in condemning rock and roll. Free Indeed was just as forceful defending a diffferent perspective than mine on that Issue but neither of us started to insult each other.
My initial blog was a generalisation of the Charismatic church. I chronicled some of the sins in that wing of the church. I was not singling out IHOP persay but I was thinking about them concerning the worship aspect. At the end of the day Drew’s weak attempt at an apology admitted that what I wrote may well be a description of any branch of the church. If so then what was so wrong or deceitful about what I had originally posted? If I singled out the Charismatic church its because that is the wing of christianity that is the perpetual focus of SOJ. It is also the wing of the church ive spent most of my life in.
Soj has mocked and condemned, pocked fun at and insulted individual charismatics time and time again. Look up last years Christmas list for the ten most dangerous teachers. I admitt most of it was funny and I had a laugh but if Drew is now convicted by the Lord for being too loose with his tongue then he needs to publicly repent to every one blogging on his site and asking that no one make fun of or expose the sin of this wing of Chrstainity any longer. Most peole take their lead from what they see the leaders post.
Drew is inconsistant and flip flops back and forth like the wind. That is a form of leadership that is sure to offend people who expect a little more consistancy. Yesterday I was just the latest recepient. Sadly I suspect ill not be the last.
I wrote this here as I suspected that what happened over there tied in with your latest blog and I thought i’d just air my thoughts. Thanks for being so understanding and supportive, blessings Paul
By: judesplace on August 3, 2007
at 1:08 pm
Paul,
It’s always good when Christian can discuss our concerns peaceably, and not be taken out of context.
I can understand your frustration. About three years ago, I had a very bad experience with a ministry I did a photography project for on a charitable basis. There was apparently an expectation that I would be able to get a publisher for the project as well, although my original part of the agreement was just to shoot the photos and try to interest someone in it. I warned these folks in the beginning that it was a very, very competitive profession, and the chances of publication were not good. However I agreed to contact some people on behalf of their project. There was absolutely no interest in it at all. The person who headed this project accused me of being neglectful in my efforts their behalf, and stopped speaking to me entirely. Apparently, she was trying to impress the pastor of the church with her zeal to raise money for missions, and needed a scapegoat when it didn’t work out.
So I’ve been there done that too, and it is
like a double whammy when you’ve tried your best, and it is taken wrong.
Hopefully, on this site that won’t happen.
By: mbaker on August 3, 2007
at 2:07 pm
And this is the problem with blogging. The fact that one cannot see the facial expressions, the non-verbal communications that go along with the verbal makes it difficult at times to “hear” what the other person is saying or trying to communicate.
I was once again taken aback by the responses. It really forces us to become better communicators
But alas, it certainly gives us an opportunity to learn how to communicate through writing better…
By: iwanthetruth on August 3, 2007
at 2:42 pm
Oh, and the thing that I have also found to be a problem is that just as we see things taken out of context when scripture is used, doesn’t it seem that we do the same thing at times in blogging.
We read a post and then we get stuck on a sentence and then make our remarks. That is why I have found that I need to read and re-read most post to make sure I am understanding the writer better.
By: iwanthetruth on August 3, 2007
at 2:45 pm
oops posted this on wrong blog first time sorry !
Wow I cant believe how offensive Drew has become! Here is his qoute over at SOJ against mbaker:
‘I’m curious why you feel the need to continue in the discussion. No one is forcing you. You seem to be sitting on the sideline passing judgment on those who are continuing to have a (in my estimation) meaningful and important discussion. Doesn’t compute. Contribute to the discussion, but don’t sit in judgment over the whole thing b/c someone disagreed with you’
The man is off the rails! The accusation that he made against you Margaret is the exact thing that he did on Wednesday night. Notice that after I challenged him to prove by quoting me on what he had accused me of there was not a whimper out of him for the rest of the evening. Then the very next morning he just blasts what I had written with his, what is becoming usual insensitive and cutting remarks. I find his hypocrisy incredible. He did the very thing he accuses you of less than 24 hours earlier!
He is like the little boy who when the game is not going his way trys to take his ball back so that no one can play.
Margaret, I write with a forceful opinionated fashon and people responding in kind is par for the coarse but I find that you are very gracious in the way you state things and did not deserve Drews cutting statement. He is the boy with the problem so take what he says with a pinch of salt.
By: judesplace on August 3, 2007
at 3:43 pm
Thanks for coming to my defense, Paul. I believe my time over there is done too. Evidently there’s something going on behind the scenes we don’t know about, so I’m just going to let it all go. I’ve pretty much said all I can on the subject of false prophets.
This is something we journalists deal with all the time. We get blasted if we tell like it is and blasted when we don’t! As a former newspaper reporter, I’m pretty used to the kinds of tactics people seem to resort to when they know they’re wrong, but try to get people’s attention off their part in a matter by placing the blame on someone else. We can expect that from politicians, but certainly it’s not a good thing for a Christian to do.
I have learned a lot from SOJ, but now I am ready to move on , and address some of the broader issues in the church. There are so many other things going on that concern folks, and I want to give those issues a turn as well. Hopefully, with some equal input from both sides.
By: mbaker on August 3, 2007
at 4:16 pm
Well you are right Margaret, after a while you start to get tunnel vision if all you ever focus upon is one aspect of Christianity, or more specifically one particular problem. There is much that needs to be said concerning the contemporary church and the more varried the coverage the healthier for all. Keep up the good work and I look forward to both reading and posting upon your site.
By: judesplace on August 3, 2007
at 4:52 pm